Boo– I mean, Girl Genius

Every now and then I pick up something and discover that it is aimed above me, written for readers who are more intelligent, virtuous, or self-disciplined than I am. The Royal Canadian Airforce XBX plan, for instance, or Kant’s Prolegomena.  I should value these opportunities for salutary self-reflection more than I do, particularly during lent.  So I am trying to embrace my experiences with Girl Genius, and to share them in the spirit of ‘Confession is good for the soul.’

My book club is reading Agatha H and the Airship City, but my copy never arrived in the mail. So I was excited when I found out that Agatha H was actually a novelization of the graphic novel Girl Genius.  I like graphic novels, and I had a feeling that if steampunk ever won my heart it would have to be through a medium that showed its architectural wonders.  I hustled right down to my local comics shop and bought a Girl Genius book.

I should have realized that my unregenerate self would interfere with my reading this book on the very first page, because it spoke up when I was reading the prologue.
This is a college student? it said.  She has bazooms the size of bowling balls!

It was right. I spend all day every day in the company of college students, and none of them are so endowed.

Not only that, my unregenerate self said, but they’re anti-gravity!

I turned the page in a reproving manner, read the very amusing summary of an opera, and left my unregenerate self to think about the introductory pages by itself.  And for the first half of the book, I was able to ignore it and steep myself in the witty dialog, splendid costumery, very fun talking castle, and glories of Victorian architecture, including the coolest stained-glass window I had ever seen. Very neat! I thought to myself.  This is a series I will have to collect.  But I had not reckoned with my innate depravity, and two-thirds of the way through Girl Genius it reasserted itself.

All these women have bazooms the size of bowling balls! my unregenerate self burst forth, apropos of nothing.  And they wear cleavage down to whoo-boy!

“So what?” I told it sternly.  “We are feminists, you and I. We believe that cup size says nothing about intellectual ability or martial prowess. We think genre should valorize its zaftig fans, rather than subjecting them to unrealistic, self-esteem-destroying, culturally contingent standards of beauty. And this is fantasy. These women probably actually belong to a different species, and are living on a planet with lower gravity.”

Look at their lower lips! it said.  And the bazooms! They all look like Cutey Bunny.  They’re Playboy cartoons.

“When did you ever see Cutey Bunny, or Playboy?” I responded. “Just because you read stuff like that behind my back does not give you a right to criticise this obviously well-educated artist.  He was doubtless inspired by the Venus of Willendorf.”

Oh yeah? said my unregenerate self.  It’s a good thing he never saw the Diana of Ephesus. Boobs!

“Sexist!”

Boobs!

What made all this even more embarrassing was that the men in the comic, and by inference the males in the audience it was written for, were obviously more evolved than I.  They treated these pneumatically advantaged characters as sexless, and valued the heroine only for her intellect.

I tried hard to live up to the moral challenge this book issued to me.  I sternly set my mind on Things Above.  But my unregenerate self could not be reined in, and with every page I turned the boobs loomed larger. And rounder. Every time I turned a page, my unregenerate self screamed Boobs! as it spotted yet another pair. It was like driving through Vegas with a pair of thirteen-year-old boys in the back seat.

So what can I say, finally, about Girl Genius?  Great world-building Boobs! Witty repartee and clever songs Boobs! Amazing Boobs architecture and scenery Boobs! Engaging Boobs boobs boobs! — oh, to hell with it. I am not worthy.

Posted in book review, my unregenerate self, reading | Comments Off on Boo– I mean, Girl Genius

‘Want’s Master’ now up on Kindle

My novella Want’s Master is now available on Kindle Select.

This was the second Royal Academy story I sold, the first I sold to Tales of the Unanticipated, and it was reprinted in Year’s Best Fantasy 3.  It’s the story of the Academy’s development officer, enchanter William Harrison Gracile, and what happens when he finds himself caught between a dream manufacturer and a professional lecher.

It’s only $0.99, folks! Go forth and buy!

(Yes, it has two covers.  I was using the one at right until a friend pointed out that it looked a lot like the cover of Twilight – and knowing when I was up against something bigger than I am, I changed it to the grey cover. But I still think the blue one is pretty.)

Posted in in the news, publication, writing | Comments Off on ‘Want’s Master’ now up on Kindle

How to Identify Ents

ents

Ents

Ent hands

Ent hands

In Tolkien’s books, young or youngish ents are mentioned. Where I live, though, the ents are obviously a later stage in the life of trees. You only find them in a mature forest that is not well manicured. An ent-woods is likely to attract large raptors and owls.

Ents are distinguishable from ordinary trees first by their lack of branches — one cannot walk around the forest if one has thirty-foot-long branches intertwined with one’s neighbors — and second by their bad skin. The best identifying feature, though, is their hands. During the day, ents sleep with folded hands.

In my neighborhood forest, all the ents are Willows. I keep hoping for a beech ent, but the beech trees tend to fall down before they reach the age to become ents.

Posted in bestiary, talking trees | Comments Off on How to Identify Ents

Flawed characters

'we're all going to hell' by Jessica Hagy

'we're all going to hell' by Jessica Hagy

For some reason, I’ve been running into a lot of discussion about flawed and non-flawed characters lately. Probably it’s always been out there and I’ve only noticed it because #feministSF twitter chat discussed feminist characters last Sunday and I attended a feminist forum about heroines in YA literature on Wednesday.

Anyway, the one thing that seems to enjoy universal consensus is that a character has to be flawed. I can’t remember where I read my favorite example of it, an anecdote from a writer whose hero wasn’t grabbing her audience until someone suggested giving him a limp — I like that because it is such a straightforward, unconcealed, marketing ploy.

Flaws are interesting. I don’t mean that a limp makes a character more interesting to me — I mean that the concept of flaws is interesting. Because what are they for? Are they like ornaments we hang on our characters after they’re constructed?

It’s my opinion that if you have to sit down and ask yourself ‘what’s this character’s flaw?’ it is already too late for that character. Because if you can pick a character up, snap off one of his legs, and put him back on the board, is he real or plastic? If you can simply add low self-esteem and myopia to your heroine and have her still doing the same things she was doing before, were you really writing about her to begin with?

But maybe that’s just me.  The fact is, I never think about whether my characters have flaws.  I’m told by readers that they do, and sometimes it comes as a shock to me.  Because to me, they just have problems.  At the beginning of almost every project, I fill a pile of notebook pages asking ‘what’s this person’s problem?’  ‘What’s his issue?’

My characters have problems like:

  • ‘The socialization of a starving badger’ (a quote from one of my favorite reviews)
  • defining themselves by their superiority to all around them
  • hating the world
  • lack of confidence
  • being doormats
  • refusing to admit they want love
  • self-hatred
  • fear of aging
  • being oblivious prigs
  • vanity
  • terminal frivolity

I think all these could be labeled flaws. But that’s not the role they play in the stories. They’re not add-ons meant to round out my characters; they are the main issues in the stories. Not only would the characters be different without them, the stories would probably not exist without them.  I write – and read – to explore these kinds of issues.

When I read articles about how characters need to have some flaws or they turn into ‘Mary Sues,’ I become disoriented.  I look at my characters through a different lens and ask myself, ‘is it too much to have her be an expert in spellcraft and have a magic stove? Even when on the other hand, her apartment is a mess and she kills someone by mistake?’  I start making lists, as if each of my characters needed a vita and an antivita of equal lengths.

In the end, though, it’s an irrelevant project.  One reason the character exists because I wanted to explore her vanity.  All her other attributes, from the dust bunnies under her couch to the front-page interview in the local newspaper, are just situations she and her vanity need to negotiate; sometimes successfully, sometimes as abject failures.  Sometimes her vanity shines forth as fully justified.  Sometimes it takes a big hit and has to be patched with transparent justifications. Sometimes it gets knocked completely down and spends months licking its wounds, but it will be back.  It’s not a flaw. It’s a character.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Flawed characters

In which five people outwit one bird

I’ve remarked before that the way to see owls is to go out without either binoculars or camera.  Ignoring my own advice, my friend Elaine Bergstrom and I went out to Seminary Woods, fully armed with cameras, to listen to the wind in the trees and search for owls.  And sure enough, we found one!

But nature is not so easily fooled, and it turned out that Elaine’s camera couldn’t zoom in on the owl, and my camera had no card in it.  At least, though, I could use it as a spotting scope, and pretty soon a group of three other hopeful owl-watchers had joined us and we were all marveling over the owl.  He really did show off, secure in the knowledge that the trio who’d joined us had a camera with dead batteries.

Of course, it didn’t take too long for us to realize that we could put other peoples’ memory chips into my camera.  So among us all, we outwitted a bird and got some fine photographs.  To wit:

owl as totoro

owl as totoro

sun on the ears

sun on the ears

sleepy owl

sleepy owl

he realizes he is observed

he realizes he is observed

and will no longer dignify us with his attention

and will no longer dignify us with his attention

Posted in art, bestiary, Elaine Bergstrom, it takes a village, real life | Comments Off on In which five people outwit one bird

Most useful quote of the week

Terry Windling posted this over at The Drawing Board. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a better way of saying it:

“So don’t be frightened, dear friend, if a sadness confronts you larger than any you have ever known, casting its shadow over all you do. You must think that something is happening within you, and remember that life has not forgotten you; it holds you in its hand and will not let you fall. Why would you want to exclude from your life any uneasiness, any pain, any depression, since you don’t know what work they are accomplishing within you?” – R. M. Rilke (from Letters to a Young Poet)

Posted in real life, Terry Windling | Comments Off on Most useful quote of the week

What my friends are up to

I’ve not been posting much lately, mainly because of The Grad Course. But my friends have been busy!

Sue Burke, translator of Amadis of Gaul, was interviewed at The Far Edge of Normal.

And Sofia Samatar has a wonderful story, The Nazir, up at Ideomancer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What my friends are up to

Transplanted Ethics

Today’s #feministSF twitter chat got me thinking about Victorian ethics.  We were discussing girls’ books, and since the most recent girls’ book I read was the one which prompted this rant about Persecuted Witches, it sprang to my mind.  As did my favorite fantasy books from childhood, which were mainly Victorian books with the exact same self-sacrificing ethics that now drives me snake in modern fantasy.

So, I thought to myself, What is your issue? Continue reading

Posted in #feministSF, reading, writing | Tagged | Comments Off on Transplanted Ethics

The Thick Night by Sunny Moraine

We discussed The Thick Night on #feministSF twitter chat today, and I’m still thinking about the story.  I like stories that challenge me, and this one really did — it’s a story about a third world woman who’s given a humanoid robot as part of an aid program.  Not a machine-style robot; an artificial intelligence eager to do anything the woman wants it to do.

Of course, things will happen in the village when one person has such a gift and the rest don’t. But what hooked me was what happened to the woman who got the robot, whose first response to it is to think that she doesn’t want a slave. The story takes the reader right along with it, so at the end you sit back, sigh happily, and then say ‘WHAT?  REALLY??’ — at yourself, not at the protagonist.

I’ve been walking around ever since with this niggling question at the back of my mind.  Do I really want a slave?  I mean, if I could have one without those inconvenient maintenance, rebellion, legality, morality issues?  And how many of the characters I love to read about in books are Dream Slaves?  The perfect nannies in Elizabeth Goudge?  Mrs. Hudson in Sherlock Holmes?  Bunter in the Peter Wimsey stories?

I judge the strength of a piece of writing by how much it inconveniences me in my daily life and makes me question my gut reactions.  This one is about a 9 on the inconvenience meter.  That’s a compliment.

Posted in book review, reading, real life | Comments Off on The Thick Night by Sunny Moraine

Kindling is up on Amazon

Kindling is now available for the Kindle at Amazon as well as Smashwords. Only $0.99!

Posted in in the news, kindling, writing | Comments Off on Kindling is up on Amazon